A candidate can solve a puzzle correctly and still write code your team ends up rewriting. Pass or fail says nothing about structure, readability, or the decisions made along the way. And reviewing submissions properly costs your engineers hours they do not have.
Aikam reviews the submission itself: how the problem was approached, how the code is structured, and where it would hold
up or break. Your engineering lead gets something they can read in two minutes.
A resume shows what a candidate has done. A work sample shows what they can do. A structured interview shows how they explain
their decisions. Aikam brings all three into one scorecard your team can review and compare.
Every submission comes back with a score per dimension, the specific lines of code behind each observation, and the full
submission for your engineers to review.
